ABSTRACT
Objectives: Cases of fulminant myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. The most severe may need venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support. Here we report two cases successfully rescued with V-A ECMO. Method(s): We included all the cases supported with V-A ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis secondary to a mRNA SARS-COV2 vaccine in the high-volume adult ECMO Program in Vall Hebron University Hospital since January 2020. Result(s): We identified two cases (table). One of them was admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In both, a peripheral V-A ECMO was implanted in the cath lab. An intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in one case for left ventricle unloading. Support could be successfully withdrawn in a mean of five days. No major bleeding or thrombosis complications occurred. Definite microscopic diagnosis could be reached in one case (Image, 3). Treatment was the same, using 1000mg of methylprednisolone/day for 3 days. A cardiac magnetic resonance 10 days after admission showed a significant improvement in systolic function and diffuse oedema and subepicardial contrast intake in different segments (Image, 1-2). Both patients were discharged fully recovered. Conclusion(s): V-A ECMO should be established in cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis with refractory cardiogenic shock during the acute phase. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION. The aetiology of Kawasaki disease (KD) remains unknown. Changes in infectious exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to infection prevention measures may have affected the incidence of KD, supporting the pathogenic role of an infectious trigger. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, phenotype and outcome of KD before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. METHODS. This was a retrospective cohort study based on patients diagnosed with KD at a Danish paediatric tertiary referral centre from 1 January 2008 to 1 September 2021. RESULTS. A total of 74 patients met the KD criteria of whom ten were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. Alof these patients were negative for SARS-CoV-2 DNA and antibodies. A high KD incidence was observed during the first six months of the pandemic, but no patients were diagnosed during the following 12 months. Clinical KD criteria were equally met in both groups. The fraction of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) non-responders was higher in the pandemic group (60%) than in the in the pre-pandemic group (28.3%), although the rate of timely administered IVIG treatment was the same in both groups (>= 80%). Coronary artery dilation was observed in 21.9% in the pre-pandemic group compared with 0% in KD patients diagnosed during the pandemic. CONCLUSION. Changes in KD incidence and phenotype were seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients diagnosed with KD during the pandemic had complete KD, higher liver transaminases and significant IVIG resistance but no coronary artery involvement.Copyright © 2023, Almindelige Danske Laegeforening. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The patient presented with nausea, appetite loss, and fatigue. She had received two doses of Pfizer/BioN-Tech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (COMIRNATY) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Acute liver injury was noted 14 days after the first dose of the vaccine. Re-exposure through the second dose worsened the liver injury. After liver biopsy on the third day of admission, methylprednisolone (1000 mg) was administered. Liver histology showed acute hepatitis with diffuse lobular inflammation/necrosis and lymphocyte-dominant infiltra-tion in the portal areas. The patient was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine based on the Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 (DDW-J) scale, which assesses the temporal relationship, liver biopsy, and laboratory findings. With improvements in the blood test parameters, prednisolone was gradually tapered and stopped. One month later, no biochemical signs of relapse were noted. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing liver injury after the administration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Japan.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Spontaneous pneumothorax is a rare complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), primarily reported in adults. Pediatric cases with bilateral pneumothorax are much less reported. Case Presentation: We presented the case of a five-year-old previously healthy boy who developed persistent fever, abdominal pain, generalized maculopapular rash, and dyspnea before admission. His chest computed tomography (CT) showed a viral involvement pattern of pneumonia suggestive of COVID-19. Subsequently, he was confirmed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). While he responded well to the therapies, on the fifth day of admission, he developed respiratory distress again. A chest roentgenogram showed bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax. Bilateral chest tubes were inserted, and his condition improved sig-nificantly after five days of admission to the intensive care unit. Two weeks later, he was discharged in good condition. Conclusion(s): Children with MIS-C associated with COVID-19 may develop primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Owing to the clinical picture overlapping with MIS-C associated with COVID-19, the timely diagnosis of pneumothorax may be challenging in such patients.Copyright © 2022, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Objectives: While persistent and relapsing symptoms of COVID-19 are increasingly documented, limited data exist on the post-acute population. The objective of this analysis is to identify the characteristics of patients diagnosed with long COVID using real-world data. Method(s): Children/adolescents (age 0-17) and adults (age 18-39, 40-64 and >=65) with >=2 primary diagnoses for U09.9 "Post COVID-19 condition" from 10/01/2021 (ICD-10 code introduction) until 03/31/2022 were selected from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, with the first diagnosis deemed index. Included patients had >=1 diagnosis for COVID-19 and continuous enrollment 12 months prior to index (baseline). To ensure alignment with most institutional definitions, >=4 weeks between initial COVID-19 infection and index was required. Diagnoses recorded +/-2 weeks from index that were not present prior to the initial COVID-19 diagnosis were summarized. Newly prescribed treatments and total medical costs were evaluated during the month following index (continuous enrollment required). Result(s): 3,587 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age 59.02, 57.56% female) with a median time from initial COVID-19 infection to long COVID diagnosis of 83 days (IQR: 46-201 days). The most common concurrent diagnoses included breathing complications such as dyspnea (20.38%) and respiratory failure (15.23%);malaise and fatigue (15.31%);symptoms related to cognitive functioning/anxiety (11.35%);and chest pain (7.67%). Children/adolescents had the highest prevalence of chest pain, while patients >=65 years of age had the highest prevalence of issues with coordination. The average total medical cost during the month following long COVID diagnosis was $4,267 (SD $14,662), with common prescriptions including albuterol (4.42%), prednisone (3.51%), and methylprednisolone (2.01%). Conclusion(s): This retrospective analysis confirms clinically documented symptoms of long COVID in a large, real-world population. Once more data become available, further research on the long term economic and clinical outcomes among patients diagnosed with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome are warranted.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is rare but described after the SARS-CoV- 2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. We present a case of severe refractory warm AIHA after this vaccine, managed with emergency splenectomy and complement inhibition with eculizumab. A male in his teens with a history of liver transplant for biliary atresia (aged 2 years) and AIHA (aged 6 years) presented to his district general hospital with jaundice, dark urine, fatigue and chest discomfort 48 h after the first dose of SARS-CoV- 2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (BNT162b2 mRNA). Investigations revealed haemoglobin (Hb) of 70 g/L and bilirubin of 98 mumol/L, which was treated as AIHA. The patient initially responded to prednisolone (1 mg/kg, 60 mg) but subsequently deteriorated and failed to respond to second-line rituximab (375 mg/m2) and two units of packed red blood cells (PRBC). By day 29 the patient had developed life-threatening anaemia culminating in a Hb of 35 g/L (after transfusion), lactate dehydrogenase (LD) of 1293 units/L and bilirubin of 228 mumol/L. This necessitated an immediate transfer to our tertiary centre for specialist support. Further investigations revealed a haptoglobin <0.1 g/L and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) strongly positive for IgG (4+) and negative for C3d. The peripheral blood film showed severe anaemia, nucleated red cells, anisocytosis and spherocytes with no autoagglutination, schistocytes or platelet clumps. Thrombocytopaenia (platelets 49 +/- 109/L) was present. Differentials were ruled out, such as paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia. HIV and hepatitis serology were negative, as were adenovirus, cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus PCR assays. A CT showed splenomegaly of 15.5 cm. Urinalysis found urobilinogen and bilirubin at high concentrations and negative urinary haemosiderin. Together, the investigations were consistent with warm AIHA. On day 29, four units of PRBC were transfused alongside 100 mg methylprednisolone and 1 g/kg IVIG. On day 30 the patient deteriorated despite the escalated treatment: Hb had only increased to 54 g/L, bilirubin was 200 mumol/L and LD was rising. Considering this life-threatening fulminant haemolysis, an emergency splenectomy was performed. This slowed haemolysis but did not completely ameliorate it: by day 33 the patient had received 15 units of PRBC. Thus, eculizumab, a terminal complement pathway inhibitor, was trialled to arrest intravascular haemolysis, alongside rituximab, repeat IVIG 1 g/kg, prednisolone 40 mg and tacrolimus 2 mg. This showed a favourable response, requiring less frequent transfusions and settling haemolysis. This case highlights the rare complication of warm AIHA with the SARS-CoV- 2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the use of emergency splenectomy for disease control, and the potential of eculizumab for refractory cases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One-third of pregnant women will experience worsening asthma requiring emergency hospitalization. However, no report comprehensively discussed the management of asthma attacks in pregnant women in impoverished settings. We attempt to illuminate what general practitioners can do to stabilize and improve the outcome of severe acute asthma exacerbations in primary care with resource limitations. CASE REPORT: A nulliparous 29-year-old woman in her 21st week of pregnancy presented severe acute asthma exacerbation in moderate persistent asthma with uncontrolled asthma status along with gestational hypertension, uncompensated metabolic acidosis with a high anion gap, anemia, respiratory infection, and asymptomatic bacteriuria, all of which influenced her exacerbations. This patient was admitted to our resource-limited subdistrict hospital in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic for optimal stabilization. Crystalloid infusions, oxygen supplementation, nebulized beta-agonist with anticholinergic agents, inhaled corticosteroids, intravenous methylprednisolone, broad-spectrum antibiotics, subcutaneous terbutaline, mucolytics, magnesium sulphate, oral antihypertensives, and continuous positive airway pressure were used to treat her life-threatening asthma. After she was stabilized, we referred the patient to a higher-level hospital with more advanced pulmonary management under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team to anticipate the worst scenario of pregnancy termination. CONCLUSION(S): Limitations in primary care, including the lack of sophisticated intensive care units and laboratory panels, may complicate challenges in managing severe acute asthma exacerbation during pregnancy. To enhance maternal-fetal outcomes, all multidisciplinary team members should be well-informed about key asthma management strategies during pregnancy using evidence-based guidelines regarding the drug, rationale, and safety profile.Copyright © 2023 Muhammad Habiburrahman, Triya Damayanti, Mohammad Adya Firmansha Dilmy, Hariyono Winarto.
ABSTRACT
Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
Background: There exists a treatment dilemma regarding the optimal and effective use of therapeutic drugs (hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine/azithromycin) for COVID-19. Furthermore, with changing guidelines, the data on drug utilization patterns across India are limited. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the prescription pattern and drug utilization trends in COVID-19 patients with the aim to study the drug utilization pattern in patients affected with COVID-19 in a dedicated COVID-19 hospital. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of the study are as follows: (1) To study drug utilization patterns according to the severity of the disease. (2) To study the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 100 medical records of patients 18 years irrespective of sex admitted in the COVID ward and ICU of a dedicated COVID hospital from May to August 2020. Pregnant and lactating women were excluded from the study. ADRs reported were also analyzed. Results: About 71% were mild in this study, 18% were moderate, and 11% were severe COVID-19 patients. Overall, the most common drugs prescribed were multivitamins, followed by pantoprazole, paracetamol, and azithromycin. Hydroxychloroquine was prescribed in 22%, favipiravir in 7%, and remdesivir in 3% of cases. The majority of moderate COVID patients received injectables piperacillin-tazobactam, methylprednisolone, and enoxaparin. The mean number of medications, duration of admission, and number of days on oxygen were higher and significant in moderate compared to mild and severe COVID patients. Overall, ADRs were encountered in 9% of cases. Conclusion: The prescribed pattern of drugs was by the national standard guidelines. Multivitamins, followed by pantoprazole, paracetamol, and azithromycin dominated the prescription pattern. Polypharmacy was encountered, which needs to be addressed for the rational use of drugs.
ABSTRACT
Various guidelines recommend steroid in only severe COVID-19 patients. But in hospitals steroids are being rampantly used even at the beginning of symptom onset. Some studies indicate starting steroid only in severe and/or patients on mechanical ventilation while some suggest starting in first 5-7 days to stave off cytokine storm. Hence this study was undertaken with the aim to study the relationship between initiation of steroid therapy and clinical outcome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The data for this study was collected from the medical records of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary care hospital. Evaluation of relationship between day of initiating steroid therapy and dose with the clinical outcome was done in terms of all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, requirement of assisted ventilation, requirement of ICU and requirement of oxygen therapy. Patients were categorized according to the day of initiating steroid after symptom onset or RTPCR or RAT positivity date, whichever was earlier in 4-7 days group, 8-10 days group and 11-14 days group. And according to dose given of methylprednisolone per day in 40 mg and 80 mg groups. All-cause mortality was significantly less in 8-10 days group (25.78%) compared to 4-7 days (38%) and 11-14 days group (39.68%) and significantly less in 40 mg group (26.67%) compared to 80 mg group (38.46%). Starting steroid between 8-10 days and in low dose (40 mg) is more beneficial in terms of all-cause mortality.Copyright © 2023, Global Research Online. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused thousands of deaths since it was declared as a pandemic. Recently it continues to be one of the most followed topics in the world in terms of its course and treatment. Favipiravir is a broad-spectrum anti-viral agent that has been shown to be effective against various Coronaviruses in vitro. However, as with any drug use, side effects may develop with the use of favipravir treatment. Case Report: We reported a 55-year-old female patient with acute urticarial with angioedema whom had COVID-19 pneumonia. She had no history of allergy, atopy, previous similar episodes or family history of hereditary angioedema. There is no drug or food consumption that may be suspicious in terms of allergy described by the patient other than favipravir. Conclusion(s): As far as we know, it is the first case reported from our country. Since there is no specific examination for differential diagnosis, we cannot distinguish as a rare side effect due to favipiravir treatment or COVID-19 cutaneous manifestation. As a result, studies involving more cases of COVID-19 skin findings are needed.© Copyright 2020 by Emergency Physicians Association of Turkey.
ABSTRACT
History: Transient and generalized adverse effects are common following COVID-19 vaccination;among other adverse effects, shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) have been known to occur. In this case, a previously healthy right-hand dominant 62-year-old male presented with left shoulder pain and weakness 3 months after receiving a COVID-19 intramuscular vaccine in the left deltoid. Approximately 2 weeks after the injection, he started experiencing pain and numbness around the injection site along with ipsilateral shoulder weakness. Despite conservative management with Motrin, Medrol Dosepak, gabapentin and physical therapy (PT), the pain and weakness persisted. Physical Exam: Left Shoulder-No calor or erythema;significant atrophy of the anterior and middle deltoid muscle relative to right side;abduction 4/5;external rotation with shoulder adducted 4/5;range of motion for active forward flexion was 150 degrees and passive was 170 degrees;passive range of motion for external rotation was 70 degrees;internal rotation to the level of L5;sensation to light touch was intact. Right Shoulder-Range of motion, strength, and sensation were intact. Cervical Spine-Full ROM;no cervical paraspinal tenderness noted. Negative Spurling's and Lhermitte's tests. Differential Diagnosis: 161. Axillary Nerve Palsy 2/2 Chemical Neurotoxicity 162. Brachial Neuritis 163. Mechanical Axillary Nerve Palsy 2/2 Vaccination 164. Partial-Tear of Left Supraspinatus Tendon 165. Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis Test Results: Left Shoulder-XR:Mild pseudo-subluxation;MRI w/o contrast: 8x9mmpartial-thickness articular surface tear of the distal supraspinatus tendon (<50%fiber thickness). Minimal subacromial bursitis. Mild acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. EMG/NCV: Left and Right Axillary Motor Nerves: prolonged distal onset latency;Left Deltoid: increased insertion activity, moderately increased spontaneous activity, reduced recruitment;Remaining LUE muscles without evidence of electrical instability Final Diagnosis: Axillary Nerve Palsy Secondary To Chemical Neurotoxicity from Intramuscular COVID-19 Vaccine. Discussion(s): We postulate that the neurologic deficits presented in our case may be attributed to chemical neurotoxicity to the axillary nerve following vaccination as the delayed onset of pain and weakness are most consistent with this differential. There are several cases of brachial neuritis following vaccination for the prevention of COVID- 19, however, EMG/NCV results in our patient were not consistent with brachial plexopathy. Additionally, while there have been a handful of reported cases of bursitis following COVID-19 vaccines falling under the SIRVA classification of injuries, this is the first case of reported axillary nerve neurapraxia. Outcome(s): The patient's left shoulder numbness and pain improved with PT and medical management. While mild improvement in strength was noted, weakness and atrophy persisted even on the third follow up visit 6 months after the initial appointment. He was counseled on his injury and was recommended to undergo repeat EMG testing to document recovery after his 6-month follow-up appointment. Follow-Up: The patient did not follow-up for a repeatEMG after his 6-month follow-up appointment. At that time, the patient was clinically stable, tolerating PT, and expecting recovery of his deltoid function.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Through the COVID pandemic there have emerged reports of autoimmunity or new rheumatic diseases presenting in patients after they had COVID-19. This is thought to be caused by cross-reactivity of the COVID-19 spike protein to human antigens. Given the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations which express the spike protein we might expect to see presentation of new rheumatic diseases following their use. We discuss a case where this appears to have occurred. Methods Our patient is a 24-year-old male with mixed phenotype acute leukaemia who had been treated with allogenic stem cell transplant and was currently in remission. He presented with fevers, palpitations, myalgia and bilateral arm and leg swelling. Symptoms began the day after receiving the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer/BioNTech.) There were no other symptoms or recent change in medications. Physical examination revealed tender oedema in his forearms, biceps and thighs bilaterally with sparring of the hands. He had reduced power with shoulder (MRC 3/5), elbow (4), wrist (4+) and hip (4) movements. Observations revealed tachycardia and fevers up to 40C. Results Laboratory studies showed markedly elevated C-reactive protein (202), creatinine kinase (6697) and troponin (593) whilst investigations for infection were negative. An autoimmune panel was positive for anti- PM-SCL-75-Ab. An electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia. Echocardiogram was normal. Bilateral upper limb dopplers revealed no deep vein thrombus. An MRI of his thighs showed diffuse symmetrical oedema within the muscles, in keeping with an inflammatory myositis. A quadricep muscle biopsy showed evidence of MHC class 1 up-regulation, suggesting an inflammatory process. In addition, there were numerous macrophages evident in the endomysium. While this can be seen in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), they would usually be found in the perimysium. After discussion between haematology, rheumatology and neurology, this was felt to be a case of vaccine induced myositis and myocarditis. Autoimmune myositis was thought to be less likely due to the relative sparing of the hands and the absence of Raynaud's phenomenon. 1 gram of intravenous methylprednisolone was then given for 3 days. The patient had a marked response with defervescence, improving laboratory markers, improved myalgia and decreased limb swelling. The patient was stepped down to a reducing regime of prednisolone and discharged. Due to relapse whilst weaning he has started on mycophenalate mofetil and rituximab and now continues to improve. Conclusion There are case reports of myositis following COVID-19 vaccination but our patient's case is complicated by the differential diagnosis of GVHD and concurrent myocarditis. Ongoing work is needed to clarify the exact link between vaccination and the presentation of a new inflammatory myositis, but it is important to recognise and start treatment early in order to preserve muscle bulk and ensure recovery.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, was recently demonstrated to be the only medication capable of reducing mortality in severe COVID disease in the UK's Recovery Trial. There is a need to compare different steroids because it is well recognised that different corticosteroids have varied pharmacodynamic properties. The aim of our study was to compare outcomes in severe or critical COVID-19 when treated with Dexamethasone versus Methyl prednisolone. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental, non-randomized study to determine whether intravenous or oral dexamethasone reduces mortality compared with intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with severe or critical COVID-19.The study was conducted on all patients aged 18 and over admitted at a 700-bedded academic medical center.The primary outcome was the mortality. The secondary outcome included length of stay. Finding(s): A total of 706 hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID- 19 were included in the study. There were n=217 patients in Dexamethasone group, n= 393 patients in Methylprednisolone group and n=96 patients who did not receive steroids.Among the baseline characteristics between the groups, there was no significant difference in median age (55 years in dexamethsone group vs 57 years in methyl prednisolone group p=0.09). There was male predominance in methylprednisolone group (74% versus 54% p<0.001) and a greater proportion of patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation (13.7% versus 3.2% p<0.001). Mortality was found to be significantly higher in methylprednisolone group compared to dexamethasone group on univariate logistic regression analysis (13.7% versus 3.2% p<0.001) and longer length of stay (7 days versus 4 days p<0.001). In multivariable model, dexamethsone was found to be associated with lower risk of mortality (aOR: 0.24;95% CI: (0.09- 0.62)(p=0.003) and lesser length of stay (aOR: 0.87;95% CI: (0.82-0.92) (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): Dexamethasone was associated with lower mortality and lesser length of stay when compared to Methyl prednisolone in moderate to critical COVID-19.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) who required oxygen therapy, but not noninvasive/invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. This retrospective observational study that was conducted from April 2021 to October 2021 at a secondary hospital in Japan enrolled patients who were administered 6 mg/day dexamethasone as an initial corticosteroid treatment on admission (dexamethasone group) and those who were administered ≥ 250 mg/day methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone group). Of the 42 participants, 40.5% (17/42) were included in the methylprednisolone group. The incidence of transfer to a tertiary hospital did not differ significantly between the methylprednisolone and dexamethasone groups (5.9% vs. 20%, p = 0.37), and in-hospital mortality was similar in both the groups (0% vs. 4%, p = 1.00). Participants in the methylprednisolone group had a significantly longer duration of oxygen therapy than the dexamethasone group (median (interquartile range) 8.5 (5.5–11.2) days vs. 4 (2.0–7.5) days, p < 0.05). Compared to dexamethasone, high-dose methylprednisolone therapy did not provide any added benefits for patients with severe COVID-19 who did not require respiratory mechanical support. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Signa Vitae is the property of Pharmamed Mado Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Case Presentation: A 10 year old male with prior COVID-19 exposure presented with 7 days of fever, rash, cough, vomiting, and hypotension. Laboratory evaluation was notable for SARS-CoV2 antibodies, elevated cardiac enzymes, BNP, and inflammatory markers. Initial echocardiogram showed normal cardiac function and a small LAD coronary aneurysm. He was diagnosed with Multisystemic Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) and given methylprednisolone and IVIG. Within 24 hours, he developed severe LV dysfunction and progressive cardiorespiratory failure requiring VA-ECMO cannulation and anticoagulation with bivalirudin. Cardiac biopsy demonstrated lymphocytic infiltration consistent with myocarditis. On VA-ECMO, he had transient periods of complete AV block. With immunomodulator treatment (anakinra, infliximab) and 5 days of plasmapheresis, inflammatory symptoms and cardiac function improved. He weaned off ECMO, and anticoagulation was transitioned to enoxaparin. He had left sided weakness 5 days later, and brain MRI revealed an MCA infarct. Ten days later, he had focal right sided weakness and repeat MRI showed multiple hemorrhagic cortical lesions, thought to be thromboembolic with hemorrhagic conversion secondary to an exaggerated inflammatory response to an MSSA bacteremia in the setting of MIS-C. Enoxaparin was discontinued. After continued recovery and a slow anakinra and steroid wean, he has normal coronary arteries, cardiac function, and baseline ECG but requires ongoing neurorehabilitation. Discussion(s): COVID-19 infection in children is often mild, but MIS-C is an evolving entity that can present with a wide range of features and severity. This case highlights two concepts. While first degree AV block is often reported in MIS-C, there is potential for progression to advanced AV block. Close telemetry monitoring is critical, especially if there is evidence of myocarditis. MIS-C shares features with Kawasaki disease, with a notable difference being a higher likelihood of shock and cardiac dysfunction in MIS-C. In MIS-C patients with cardiovascular collapse requiring ECMO, there is a risk for stroke. There should be a low threshold for neuroimaging and multidisciplinary effort to guide anticoagulation in these complex cases.
ABSTRACT
Hepatitis A is a common viral infection worldwide that is transmitted via the fecal-oral route. Since the introduction of an efficient vaccine, the incidence of infection has decreased but the number of cases has risen due to widespread community outbreaks among unimmunized individuals. Classic symptoms include fever, malaise, dark urine, and jaundice, and are more common in older children and adults. People are often most infectious 14 days prior to and 7 days following the onset of jaundice. We will discuss the case of a young male patient, diagnosed with acute hepatitis A, leading to fulminant hepatitis refractory to conventional therapy and the development of subsequent kidney injury. The medical treatment through the course of hospitalization was challenging and included the use of L-ornithine-L-aspartate and prolonged intermittent hemodialysis, leading to a remarkable outcome. Hepatitis A is usually self-limited and vaccine-preventable;supportive care is often sufficient for treatment, and chronic infection or chronic liver disease rarely develops. However, fulminant hepatitis, although rare, can be very challenging to manage as in the case of our patient.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is associated with disseminated lung damage in patients, Dexamethasone can reduce lung injury caused by inflammation and there reduce the progression to respiratory failure and prevent death. This systematic review aimed to determine the benefits and safety of Dexamethasone in COVID-19 treatment. The study was performed by a comprehensive literature search which were published in several databases i.e., PubMed, Science Direct, VHL Regional Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov within the search time of 28 November 2020. Inclusion criteria were articles on the study on COVID-19 patients who received Dexamethasone, observational and experimental studies on the outcomes use evaluation of Dexamethasone. Exclusion criteria are the articles that do not provide control in controlled studies and do not show clear research results on the use of Dexamethasone. An initial search from four databases by entering keywords resulted in 1,046 articles. After screening articles duplication we obtained 835 studies. Finally, 6 articles were obtained after we screened for the article that it can be obtained its full text and 5 articles joined in articles included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that Dexamethasone in Covid-19 patients could reduce the incidence of death within 28 days with RR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.57-0.97 P=0.13) compared with Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone was compared without corticosteroids with RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97 P=0.01). Dexamethasone also reduced mechanical ventilator use during treatment with RR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.86-1.05 P = 0.28) compared without corticosteroids. The conclusion from these results: the use of Dexamethasone can reduce the number of deaths in COVID-19 patients, especially severe and critically ill category patients.